Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condorcet Instant Runoff Voting
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete 0/4/1(see talk page) karmafist 20:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Condorcet Instant Runoff Voting[edit]
This was blanked by an WP:XD-er, with a somewhat dismissive edit summary questioning the method's existence. Google would seem to have similar problems with it. Delete invented voting scheme. Can I use the word voting for a change? -Splashtalk 22:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "Can I use the word voting for a change?" How nostalgic! HackJandy 22:57, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If it can be documented with references, it should be kept; if not, delete. It appears to be a variant of two widely-used voting methods, neither of which is done here. 147.70.242.21 23:26, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Where is here? Peyna 00:47, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Last time I checked, this is a page for voting for/against deleting an article about a voting method. B.Wind 04:30, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps 147.70.242.21 was referring to the place he was at when he wrote that message. Therefore, all we can be certain of is that at 147.70.242.21's house they don't use a Condorcet or Instant Runoff Voting. Either way, it was a pretty ambiguous statement and I refuse to believe he was merely referring to AfD. Peyna 04:46, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Last time I checked, this is a page for voting for/against deleting an article about a voting method. B.Wind 04:30, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Where is here? Peyna 00:47, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Condorcet method, if this info is not already there, and if someone can cite a source. There is a Condorcet-Smith system, of which this seems to be a modification. -- Dalbury(Talk) 03:40, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - normally I'd say merge or keep but four Google hits including this one indicates either original research or a very substantial verifiability problem. Or maybe a neologism. Or a hoax. Or something else that WP:ISNOT. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 16:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condorcet Approval Instant Runoff Voting. BD2412 T 18:15, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.